On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 8:26 PM, Michael J Gruber <git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Tests please? > > Heck, we don't have any to begin with, and this is marked RFC. Given our > usual reluctance to change even undocumented behavior I'm not going to > bother with tests for an RFC. Ugh.. I missed the "RFC" part on the subject. Sorry. >>> As an intended side effect, users mistaking "git show commit -- path" >>> for "git show commit:path" are automatically reminded that they asked >>> git to show a commit, not a blob. >> >> Nor a tree. I don't really see how "git show commit:path" and "git how >> commit -- path" are relevant for it to be mentioned here. > > "git show commit:path" is relevant because that is what the OP was > trying to do, and "git show commit:path" is relevant because that is > what the OP tried and confused him because there was no output at all. > Not to mention that this is the command this patch is about. Thanks. I see I also missed the original thread somewhere. Someone needs a sleep, me thinks :) -- Duy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html