Re: Why can't I use git-bisect to find the first *good* commit?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>> What is the point is finding manually a commit *on the same branch* when
>> the tool can do that for you?

> Seems to me that this is trying to cram two questions into one:
>
> A) where did branch foo diverge from branch bar and
> B) which commit between that ancestor and bar did things break.

To find the answer to A, I generally just do this (using an alias):

git log --graph --oneline --all

It takes at most a couple of seconds... hardly what I'd call a manual process.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]