Re: [PATCH 4/4] diff: turn on rename detection progress reporting

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am 3/24/2011 18:51, schrieb Jeff King:
> Since all of the progress happens before we generate any
> output, this looks OK, even when output goes to a pager.
> We do the usual --progress/--no-progress options and check
> isatty(2) to enable the feature.

Why does it look good? Because the pager is not spawned, yet? Then this is
not so good because on Windows we don't have a facility to wait until
there is output, and for this reason we spawn the pager immediately.

-- Hannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]