Re: [BUG] StGit removed git branch of the same name as StGit branch

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jakub Narebski <jnareb@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Catalin Marinas wrote:
>> I've never thought anyone would see a different meaing for the
>> "branch" command. What you wanted to do was the reverse of the "init"
>> command. Maybe something like "uninit" or a "--uninit" option to
>> "branch".
>
> Yes, that is what I wanted. "stg branch --unmanage" or something
> like that.

I'll put it on my to-do list.

> By the way, why "stg branch --delete" doesn't remove reflog? Not that I'm
> complaining, because it sure saved some work when resurrecting branch, and
> I didn't loose reflog info.

Reflogs came into GIT after the StGIT branch command and never looked
at them in detail. And maybe it should not touch the reflog info,
especially for situations like this, unless GIT has a mechanism for a
trash bin (StGIT has one for patches - .git/patches/<branch>/trash/ -
but undocumented)

-- 
Catalin
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]