hoi :) On Tue, Nov 21, 2006 at 01:42:22AM +0100, Jakub Narebski wrote: > Perhaps it would be best to join those two subproject support > solutions together: "bind" tree/commit mount header in commit > object, and "commit" entry in a tree. But which is the autoritative source then? Does it give any more information? The advantage in your proposal would be that submodules would be visible immediately when looking at the commit, without having to traverse the entire tree. This may be worthwhile when showing the combined history of parent and submodules. But still this looks like "caching submodule information in the commit object" and I do not know if we really want to do that. -- Martin Waitz
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature