On 11/20/06, Carl Worth <cworth@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, 21 Nov 2006 13:29:20 +1300, "Martin Langhoff" wrote: > I see - thanks for the pointer. Sorry to hear others in the Moz > project weren't so keen on hearing about alternatives to SVN. Long > term only something like GIT seems viable for such a large project (in > terms of community, branches/subprojects and codebase). ... > Eventually the Moz crowd will outgrow SVN - perhaps we should be > parsing the SVN dump format instead ;-) From what I understand, mozilla is currently using CVS and is looking to replace that. The remaining options being considered are bzr and hg, (git having been discarded due to the lack of a "native" win32
brendan said SVN is likely for the main Mozilla repo and monotone for the new Mozilla 2 work. No native win32 caused git to be immediately discarded.
client---the cygwin stuff is apparently not considered viable for whatever reason). -Carl
-- Jon Smirl jonsmirl@xxxxxxxxx - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html