J. Bruce Fields wrote: > On Mon, Nov 20, 2006 at 10:01:44PM +0100, Jakub Narebski wrote: > >> I have used StGit (wonderfull tool) to manage patches on git branch >> gitweb/web. Unfortunately, I have named stg branch the same as git >> branch. When removing stg branch (I wanted to remove >> heads/base/gitweb/web) using "stg branch --delete gitweb/web" it >> deleted also git branch when I wanted to remove only the StGit managed >> indicator. > > You probably actually had to "stg branch --delete --force", didn't you? Nope. "stg branch --delete gitweb/web" > What you want is "stg commit". No. Whole stack was committed, I wanted only get rid of heads/base/gitweb/web (of StGit managed branch indicator). >> Perhaps that is correct behavior... but certainly unexpected. > > I think "stg branch --delete" is pretty clearly named and documented.... I thought it delete only stg branch, refs/base/gitwbe/web, and not refs/heads/gitweb/web. > The idea I guess was to make it possible to use stgit (and only stgit) > for everything, and never type a git command. It might have been better > to make stgit only manage patch series, and admit that people should use > git for the rest. Then it might work more like you expect. Yes, I expected to use StGit as a kind of preprocessing (branch preparation) for git. -- Jakub Narebski Warsaw, Poland ShadeHawk on #git - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html