Re: [PATCH/RFD 0/2] revision.c: --merges, --no-merges and --merges-only

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 12:33:56PM +0100, Michael J Gruber wrote:

> This mini series makes it so that --no-merges undoes --merges
> and vice versa, as the user should be able to expect,
> and that --merges-only is a separate option.

Having recently been confused by this (and frustrated at the lack of an
equivalent to your new "--merges"), I do think the result is better.

However, this is totally changing the meaning of an option to plumbing
like rev-list (among others). Is it worth the breakage? If so, what's
the migration plan? Did I miss a discussion somewhere?

-Peff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]