Re: [PATCH 1/3] make_absolute_path: Don't try to copy a string to itself

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Carlos MartÃn Nieto <cmn@xxxxxxxx> writes:

> Sometimes (at least in t-0001-init.sh test 12), the return value of
> make_absolute_path() is passed to it as an argument, making the first

I don't think it is a bad idea per-se to avoid a copy from the same memory
location into the same memory location, but independent of the necessity
of fixes at the low-level, shouldn't we fix the callers that do not check
if what they have is already absolute?

> and second arguments to strlcpy() the same, making the test fail when
> run under valgrind.
>
> Signed-off-by: Carlos MartÃn Nieto <cmn@xxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> This patch assumes the path returned by make_absolute_path() is never
> longer than PATH_MAX, which I think is a safe assumption.

>
>  abspath.c |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/abspath.c b/abspath.c
> index 91ca00f..9149a98 100644
> --- a/abspath.c
> +++ b/abspath.c
> @@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ const char *make_absolute_path(const char *path)
>  	char *last_elem = NULL;
>  	struct stat st;
>  
> -	if (strlcpy(buf, path, PATH_MAX) >= PATH_MAX)
> +	if (buf != path && strlcpy(buf, path, PATH_MAX) >= PATH_MAX)
>  		die ("Too long path: %.*s", 60, path);
>  
>  	while (depth--) {
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]