On Sun, 2011-03-13 at 12:41 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Drew Northup <drew.northup@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > -The latter form is just a short-hand of `git checkout topic` > > -followed by `git rebase master`. > > +*NOTE:* The latter form is just a short-hand of `git checkout topic` > > +followed by `git rebase master`. If the rebase is aborted `topic` will > > +remain the checked-out branch. > > The behaviour is consistent between the case where "this on that" form > succeeds and it stops and gets aborted, and I think both are euqally > noteworthy. So I'd suggest dropping "if aborted". So a synthetic look at that might be: -If the rebase is aborted +When rebase exits Comments? I'll see about re-rolling likewise (and on something with a more recent runtime!). -- -Drew Northup ________________________________________________ "As opposed to vegetable or mineral error?" -John Pescatore, SANS NewsBites Vol. 12 Num. 59 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html