Re: Shouldn't git-ls-files --others use $GIT_DIR?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Nov 19, 2006 at 02:37:42PM CET, Nikolai Weibull wrote:
> If I do
> 
> GIT_DIR=$HOME/projects/<project>/.git git ls-files --others
> 
> from, e.g., $HOME, I get a list of all the files in $HOME and its
> subdirectories that aren't in said git repository.  Shouldn't --others
> use $GIT_DIR, instead of ".", or am I missing something here?

git-ls-files --others lists untracked files in the current directory by
comparing it to the index stored in $GIT_DIR/index and listing files
present in the current directory but not in the index.

GIT_DIR is a path to the Git repository the commands should work with,
but if they work on working tree, they look at the current directory for
it.

-- 
				Petr "Pasky" Baudis
Stuff: http://pasky.or.cz/
The meaning of Stonehenge in Traflamadorian, when viewed from above, is:
"Replacement part being rushed with all possible speed."
		-- Kurt Vonnegut, Sirens from Titan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]