Phil Hord venit, vidit, dixit 03.03.2011 04:51: > On 03/01/2011 07:12 PM, Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 6:16 PM, Michael J Gruber >> <git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy venit, vidit, dixit 01.03.2011 12:13: >>>> If you are going to turn pathspecs into something more complex, >>>> reserve room for future extension. I have negative pathspecs that can >>>> utilize it. >>>> >>>> I take it, from now on people must refer file name ':foo' as './:foo' >>>> with your patch? >>> That is up for discussion, of course. When discussing a new approach for >>> file mode dependent attributes, I was hoping to get through with >>> symlink:path, and did not. But it was decided that something like >>> :symlink:path would be good enough, in the sense of avoiding enough >>> possible conflicts. That made me hope that :path would be, too. >> Good morning! I'm saner now. How about :/path? That would reserve >> anything next to ':' except '/'. > > I like this. The only 'failure' that comes to mind is something like > > git log -- */*.c > > when there's a subdirectory named ':'. msysgit anyone? Michael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html