Re: [PATCH 1.8.0] add: make "add -u" update full tree without pathspec

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 8:46 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy <pclouds@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> But how many people may be impacted this way? ...
>> Or accept that evolution is painful and go with current plan, which I'm OK too.
>
> So even though you raised a concern on possible pains during the
> migration, you think that the migration plan outlined would be the
> least bad one?

I only see two ways. The 'new command' approach only delays the
transition until a later (user decided) point. There's no guarantee
that I (user) would make a good decision to switch. Plus the outlined
plan looks simpler. Yes, it seems better.
-- 
Duy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]