Re: [PATCH] Limit file descriptors used by packs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@xxxxxxxxxxx> [110228 21:27]:
> By using a hard upper limit that is below the rlimit of the current
> process, it is not necessary to check for EMFILE on every single
> fd-allocating system call.  Instead reserving 8 file descriptors
> makes it safe to assume the system call won't fail due to being
> over limit in the filedescriptor limit.

Isn't 8 quite a bit low for a reserve? Couldn't some libc stuff
(especially nss modules perhaps activated by something) easily surpass
that?

	Bernhard R. Link
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]