Michael J Gruber <git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Miles Bader venit, vidit, dixit 28.02.2011 09:42: >> Michael J Gruber <git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >>> - "commit -a,--add <addopts>" be "add <addopts> && commit", and >> >> Can you give an example? It look like you're proposing that the user >> would have to type "commit -a -u", which is pretty gross for a fairly >> common operation that already has a good shorthand... > > we don't need "-u" any more, because it's the new default. So, > obviously, "commit -a" would do what it always did. Ok, so for "-u" that works out. But for -A, the user would have to type "commit -a -A". That sort of indirection is clever, but it seems confusing and inconvenient for the user, and I think a very common question would be "why do I need to use -a when it's obvious that -A should imply that?" -miles -- Vote, v. The instrument and symbol of a freeman's power to make a fool of himself and a wreck of his country. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html