Sean wrote:
On Sat, 18 Nov 2006 16:04:43 +0100
Rene Scharfe <rene.scharfe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
git-status is a wrapper around git-runstatus that takes the same
options as git-commit. It could have been named 'git-commit --dry-run'.
What could be said in the docs as to when the use of one is preferred
over the other?
All commands deserve a man page.
Exactly. Even plumbers read manuals ;-). Well, me at least.
Heh, I suppose you and Petr are right. It's just that in recent
discussions the great number of commands provided by Git is seen
as a UI problem. Thus having two commands that seem to do the
exact same thing gives more such pain for no gain.
It's possible that plumbers should not be seen as "users" but
rather as coders capable of reading traditional text based
(non man-page) documentation for their purposes, and man pages
should only exist (or at least installed) for user level commands.
Are you suggesting that all non section 1 man pages should not exist?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html