Re: [PATCH 4/8] trace: refactor to support multiple env variables

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 11:44:13AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 10:25:04AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> > ...
> > So I guess I'm not sure what your complaint is.
> 
> There was no complaint. I wanted to see the reasoning behind the choices
> you made spelled out (and later copied into developer docs).

Oh. :) I'll write something up to go into Documentation/technical for my
re-roll. And something should clearly go in Documentation/git.txt for
users, too.

> > I think I covered that pretty well above, but you lose the flexibility
> > of pushing different trace types to different places if you want to.
> 
> That statement illustrates the inflexibility that all packet traces going
> to a same place rather clearly, doesn't it, though?  That "two-tier" thing
> was my primary concern.

Sorry, I don't quite understand what you're saying here.

-Peff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]