Jeff King venit, vidit, dixit 24.02.2011 17:00: > On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 04:54:02PM +0100, Michael J Gruber wrote: > >>> But as you mentioned, it is sadly not as trivial as just adding a >>> new way to call "git add". So I think nobody has simply cared >>> enough to implement it to date. >> >> How about this program: >> >> - refactor add, commit to share the "add parts" > > Sounds good. > >> - homogenize interface: replace "add -u" by "add -a" (hidden >> compatibility thingy of course) > > I like it. > >> - hom. interface: allow "-a pathspec" for commit > > What would it do? It would just behave like "git commit -i > pathspec"? It should do what "-u pathspec" does for add: limit "all tracked" to the pathspec. I know it's the same as without "-a", but why bail out on it? > >> - have commit -A > > Sounds good. > >> Oh, and do "commit -n" what one would expect [1.8.0] :) > > Yeah, I like that, too. > > Are you volunteering to work on it all? :) I've done all the careful planning already, laid out in nice steps. Now it's your time ;) OK, I'll do "-n". Michael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html