Re: [PATCH v4 00/73] No-op gettextize core Git C programs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 02:37, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> Ãvar ArnfjÃrà Bjarmason <avarab@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>
>>> Â * Reverted back to using the "gettextize" patch subjects I
>>> Â Â originally used. I'm using these consistetly so I can later git
>>> Â Â log --grep=gettextize: to find them. I'd like to preserve that
>>> Â Â attributed.
>>
>> Can we make that shorter, perhaps just "i18n:"? ÂIn this series, your
>> first three and Jonathan's are oddballs that do not have "gettexize:"
>> anyway.
>>
>> Will give it a whirl. ÂThanks.
>
> It was a slightly unpleasant experience to merge this round to 'pu' (after
> excluding the earlier round from it, of course), as a few topics in flight
> that reorganized existing functions into smaller helpers had to conflict
> with this patch. ÂI tried to be careful but please double check the result,
> perhaps with:
>
> Â Â$ git show --first-parent origin/pu
>
> when it is propagated to mirrors.

I've gone over the version in pu. It looks good to me.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]