Re: [PATCH] do not overwrite untracked symlinks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Clemens Buchacher <drizzd@xxxxxx> writes:

> I strongly feel that we should separate the merge process into two
> steps.
>
>  - First, do everything in the index, ignoring the work tree.
>
>  - Second, checkout the index to the work tree while making sure no
>    changes or untracked files get overwritten.

Yes, I think most people who are familiar with the internals agreed on
this long time ago.

> ... But I can't
> get myself to feel good about fixing the function name, but not the
> function.

I think I said what I wanted to say badly.

I agree that the code structure is suboptimal; the badly named function is
just a manifestation of the fact that the abstraction used in the
codepaths involved is not a good one, I think.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]