On 11/17/06, Petr Baudis <pasky@xxxxxxx> wrote:
If someone writes a crash course in pure Git covering the same grounds as the current ones (possibly by just extending/retouching the tutorial) (it does not necessarily need to be a "refugee" crash course, it can build up from scratch), I can add it on the web. If it becomes as easy to use and with as mild learning curve as Cogito, it means Cogito got mostly obsolete and I'll happily remove the Cogito crash courses from the web.
As a relatively new user myself, I ran into the same confusion when I came to the website for the first time. One of the most prominent things on the front page is the "Git Crash Courses." Clicking on that gives me the crash courses, all of which are about Cogito, not for Git. So why doesn't the front page say "Cogito Crash Courses" instead? And I don't think it matters much whether Cogito makes things easier or not -- the Git website really should make Git's documentation more prominent than Cogito's. I'd expect the opposite of Cogito's website. It *is* unnecessarily confusing. -- epistemological humility Chris Riddoch - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html