On Fri, 17 Nov 2006 17:53:33 +0100 Petr Baudis <pasky@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Nov 17, 2006 at 05:34:04PM CET, Sean wrote: > > It's just that the separate Cogito tool shouldn't have a place on the > > Git website any more prominent than say StGit does. > > It doesn't - look at the "Maintaining external patches" crash course. > > Porcelains are integral part of the Git environment. I think several > people have already tried to explain it before. > There is enough native Git documentation and hopefully more coming that third party tools should be pushed behind the scenes a bit. At least on the GIT website. Of course there is nothing wrong with having information there, but the main thrust should be about Git and how to use it directly without porcelains. Especially in the light that people have recently expressed a desire to advocate and document the use of native Git more strongly. Having a link to Cogito off the front page of the Git website that says... Cogito makes things "easier", no matter how much you personally believe it, isn't the way everyone feels and is at odds with the native-git message and improvement effort. Sean - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html