Re: [PATCH] submodule: no [--merge|--rebase] when newly cloned

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 17 Feb 2011, Johannes Sixt wrote:

> Am 2/16/2011 20:51, schrieb Junio C Hamano:
> > Here is how to write the above more concisely, efficiently and portably.
> > 
> > 	case "$2;" in
> >         *";$1;"*)
> >         	echo yes ;;
> >         *)
> >         	echo no ;;
> > 	esac
> > 
> > The trailing ';' takes care of the case where cloned_modules has only one
> > element, in which case you have ";name" in "$2".  No need for a loop.
> 
> And while you are here, you could make this:
> 
> list_contains()
> {
> 	case "$2;" in
> 	*";$1;"*)
> 		: yes ;;
> 	*)
> 		! : no ;;
> 	esac
> }
> 
> and test for the exit code of this function rather than its output at the
> call site.

According to Brandon Casey: "Some platforms (IRIX 6.5, Solaris 7) do
not provide the 'yes' utility." See 8648732 (t/test-lib.sh: provide a
shell implementation of the 'yes' utility, 2009-08-28).


/Martin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]