Re: [PATCH 1/2] Introduce CHERRY_PICK_HEAD

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 5:08 PM, Jay Soffian <jaysoffian@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> When a cherry-pick conflicts git advises to use:
>
> Â$ git commit -c <original commit id>
>
> to preserve the original commit message and authorship. Instead, let's
> record the original commit id in CHERRY_PICK_HEAD and advise to use:
>
> Â$ git commit -c CHERRY_PICK_HEAD

Wouldn't it be more convenient to do "git cherry-pick --continue"
instead of "git commit -c CHERRY_PICK_HEAD"?
-- 
Duy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]