Ãvar ArnfjÃrà Bjarmason <avarab@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > I've read this over, haven't run it, but I really like the idea. It > sucks that you have to save away the commit sha1 somwhere after a > failed cherry-pick to use it again. It should just behave like `git > rebase --continue`, which this implements. I don't understand. What do you think rebase does to be able to continue? Doesn't it have to save the commit object name away somewhere? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html