Re: Consistent terminology: cached/staged/index

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 2:12 AM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Miles Bader <miles@xxxxxxx> writes:
>> Michael J Gruber <git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>> Short options should really not be "wasted" easily. "-s" named after "to
>>> stage" is really problematic, as outlined in this thread.
>>
>> Er, but the point is that this is _such_ a common operation, that a
>> short option for it would not be "wasted" at all.
>
> True, but I am afraid "-c" is not it, as it would certainly be confusing
> to users who know what "diff" does before they learn "git diff".

Er...?

Here we were talking about using "-s" (inspired by "--staged"), which
I suggested because you earlier objected to "-c"...

-miles

-- 
Cat is power.  Cat is peace.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]