Re: [1.8.0 RFC] push: start warning upcoming default change for push.default

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 4:21 PM, Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Which was intentional on my part. If the message says what to set it
>> to, the beginner will just go 'okay' and set it to that, in which
>> case, what is the point of changing the default?
>
> Wait, why isn't that a good thing?

Because 'current' is the more sensible default behavior. If everyone
sets push.default to 'matching' because that's what the message
advises, what's the point of changing the implicit default to
'current'?

j.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]