Re: [PATCH 2/7] push: describe --porcelain just like commit and status

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Michael J Gruber <git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> -		OPT_BIT( 0,  "porcelain", &flags, "machine-readable output", TRANSPORT_PUSH_PORCELAIN),
> +		OPT_BIT( 0,  "porcelain", &flags, "show porcelain output format", TRANSPORT_PUSH_PORCELAIN),

Thanks, but I wonder if machine-readable is more descriptive than
"porcelain output format", iow, updating commit/status may be better.

The option was meant to mean "output format for Porcelain script writers
to stay machine readable" but it can be misunderstood as "output format
a Porcelain command would produce with chromes and glitters".
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]