Re: [PATCH v2 00/31] refactor rebase

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 13 Feb 2011, Martin von Zweigbergk wrote:

> On Fri, 11 Feb 2011, Martin von Zweigbergk wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, 10 Feb 2011, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> > 
> > > I am not sure if forbidding "-v --continue" adds any value; would it be
> > > too much effort to allow "--continue -v" instead to achieve the same
> > > degree of consistency between the two?
> > 
> > I'll have a look at it when
> > I get some time.
> 
> This would apply on top of mz/rebase after dropping 95135b0 (rebase:
> stricter check of standalone sub command, 2011-02-06). If you agree
> with it, I will include it in a future re-roll.

Sorry, anyone who intends to test it, squash in this missing
test_must_fail first.

-- 8< --
diff --git a/t/t3418-rebase-continue.sh b/t/t3418-rebase-continue.sh
index 1581f00..02ac92f 100755
--- a/t/t3418-rebase-continue.sh
+++ b/t/t3418-rebase-continue.sh
@@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ test_expect_success 'rebase --continue --no-rerere-autoupdate overrides' '
 	git reset --hard topic@{1} &&
 	test_must_fail git rebase -m --rerere-autoupdate master &&
 	test "$(cat F2)" = "Resolved" &&
-	git rebase --continue --no-rerere-autoupdate &&
+	test_must_fail git rebase --continue --no-rerere-autoupdate &&
 	test "$(cat F3)" = "Resolved" &&
 	test_must_fail git rebase --continue &&
 	git add F3 &&
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]