Linus Torvalds escreveu: > My real point was/is that usually it's really not the "naming details" > that people _really_ have problems with. The real problems tend to be in > learning a new workflow. I agree that discussions on naming may cloud the issue, but "learning the workflow" implies that people should adapt to the limitations of their tools. That's only a viable stance when the tools are finished and completely perfect. Until that time, it would be good goal to remove all idiosyncrasies, all gratuitious asymetries and needless limitations in the commands of git, eg. - clone but not a put-clone, - pull = merge + fetch, but no command for merge + throw - clone for getting all branches of a repo, but no command for updating all branches of a repo. Of course, when all warts are fixed, backward compatibility will force us to choose some new names. At that point, a discussion on naming is in place. -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - hanwen@xxxxxxxxx - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html