On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 6:46 AM, Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > Assuming we move from relative to full-tree, I think the possible things > to move are: > > Âadd -u/-A > Âarchive > Âgrep > Âclean > Âls-files/ls-tree > > I don't think it's worth moving ls-files/ls-tree. They're plumbing that > people don't use frequently. So the cost of moving them is high (because > we are breaking something meant to be scriptable) and the benefit is low > (because users don't type them a lot). No we should not, but we should add --full-tree to ls-files/ls-tree/archive. I'd love "ls-files --full-tree '*somefile*'". -- Duy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html