Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy <pclouds@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > Perhaps it's not a good approach after all. What I wanted was to make > pre-1.8.0 tolerate empty trees created by 1.8.0. Perhaps it's better > to just let pre-1.8.0 refuse to work with empty trees, forcing users > to upgrade to 1.8.0? I don't think we saw even something remotely resembles an agreement that empty tree is a good thing to have yet. Why are you rushing things? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html