Heya, On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 09:58, Johan Herland <johan@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > This is the same technique we use when talking about branch names: On this > mailing list, nobody is confused when I refer to 'maint', 'master', 'next' > and 'pu'. Still, in our own work repos (at least in mine), these branches > are actually called "refs/remotes/origin/<name>" (commonly referred to by > their shorthands "origin/<name>"). Here we are, juggling the same kind of > namespaces that I propose for tags, and it seems to work well without > causing much confusion. With the difference that you can't refer to "maint" as just "maint" unless you've created "refs/heads/maint" iff it is unambiguous. -- Cheers, Sverre Rabbelier -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html