Linus Torvalds escreveu: > So current rule (and this is not new, it's always been true): the ONLY > time you use "git init-db" is when you are going to start a totally new > project. Never _ever_ otherwise. If you want to track another project, use > "git clone". Actually, only a 2 weeks ago, you suggested that I share the website and main source code for my project in a single repository for reasons of organization. In this setup I find it logical to do git init-db git pull ..url.. website/master to wind up with just the 5mb website, instead of the complete 70mb of packed source code with all of its branches and tags. > It's not that it isn't typical, it's that you are using the wrong model. > Maybe it's not well documented, I can easily give you that, but ALL your > problems come from that fundamental starting point: you shouldn't have > used "git init-db" in the first place. > > Somebody want to document it? > > Alternatively, we certainly _could_ make "git pull" just accept an empty > git repo, and make it basically create the current branch. Yes, I would like that. -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - hanwen@xxxxxxxxx - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html