On 01/02/11 14:15, Junio C Hamano wrote: > I am fine with "tests/", by the way. FWIW, CCAN and Rubygems both use plain "test". "t/" is a long standing convention for many projects, dating back to at least 1987 with Perl 1.0. As far as I know it was unusual at the time for being a very test-driven development and inventing the TAP (Test Anything Protocol). It is something of a mark of respect to the heritage of TDD to have it there, but that doesn't mean that "test" might be better for the project now. I'd also think about removing the "t" from the front of all the test script names, those are a PITA :-). And possibly allowing the scripts to be broken into subdirectories. Sam -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html