Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 11:55 AM, Vincent Hanquez <tab@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 01/02/11 22:48, J.H. wrote: >>> >>> The wiki will almost universally have a "central site" no matter what >>> the backend. Personally I see little advantage to having a git backed >>> wiki myself. >> >> with git based wiki, you can clone the whole wiki on your local machine, and >> read/edit/commit on it locally using standard editor tool (i.e. $EDITOR). >> and the history/revision/diff is completely built-in. > > But there's no git based wiki (or any other wiki) that has even a > fraction of the features that MediaWiki has, or IMO a markup format > similarly sane. Gollum (the engine used by git-based wikis on GitHub) offers support for MediaWiki format. I don't know how it is with editing and presenting history (end e.g. reverting spam), especially on older or text browsers. -- Jakub Narebski Poland ShadeHawk on #git -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html