On Mon, 31 Jan 2011, Jeff King wrote: > On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 07:29:54PM -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > > This is no excuse not to do proper source tree reorganization. > > I think this is the crux of our disagreement. I don't agree that your > proposal is any way more "proper" than what is there now. Leaving the > rename issue aside (i.e., if we were starting a new project), I would > still be slightly against a src/ directory. I find them annoying. Let's agree to disagree then. What I see in the root of the Git source tree is a huge clutter of source files, binary files, scripts, and subdirectories all mixed together. If you know by hart where things are because you've been hacking on them for the last 5 years then of course you might not see the point. But since I didn't work much on Git lately, things are not as obvious to me as they used to be. Looking back at it now with some distance, this tree looks like a mess and it is really annoying to work with. > But I don't care _that_ much, and I would rather not waste either of our > time debating it more. I would much rather you spend your time on > pack v4. :) I wish... I wish. But I have a plan which might involve taking some vacation from $day_job in the Caribbeans with $wife and no kids, where $wife is going to do scuba diving with her club mates while I'll be alone with a laptop and no net connection and therefore nothing else to do for a week. I've been craving for such free time for quite a while now. Nicolas -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html