On Fri, 28 Jan 2011, Bert Wesarg wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 17:17, Felipe Contreras
> <felipe.contreras@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > So 'git merge' is 'git merge @{upstream}' instead of 'git merge -h';
> > it's better to do something useful.
>
> Nice idea. Could you have a look into git rebase, I think this could
> be applied there too.
I submitted an RFC patch for that a while ago [1]. I will soon send a
re-roll of some rebase refactoring patches I have been working on (I
have been busy at work and also waiting for 1.7.4 to be finished). I
will then send an updated "default upstream" patch again on top of the
refactoring patches.
And thanks for taking care of the merge case, Felipe. I'm still
struggling with the part of Git written in C, so I'm glad you took
that part.
>
> Anyway, I think some high level sanity check won't harm. Ie. check if
> there is an upstream configured.
Will be done in the case of rebase at least (stolen from the
implementation in git pull).
[1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/161382/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html