Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > -# x <cmd>, exec <cmd> = Run a shell command <cmd>, and stop if it fails > +# x, exec = run command using shell, and stop if it fails I don't think this is a good change to remove the <cmd> part. All other commands are used with <command> <sha1> <subject line> and I don't think the user would be able to guess that exec is different without a hint. If the problem is the wording of the sentence that may imply that <cmd> should be the shell itself, then why not x <cmd>, exec <cmd> = run command <cmd> using shell, and stop if it fails ? -- Matthieu Moy http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html