On 11-01-13 04:32, Jeff King wrote: > On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 04:12:25AM +0100, Tomas Carnecky wrote: > >> On 1/12/11 3:07 PM, Maaartin wrote: >>> There are files in my working tree which changes, but their size and mtime >>> remains the same (I know it's strange, but it's useful). Can I make git to re- >> >> When can this be useful? Well, not really. I was asked to place a line containing a version number and a fingerprint in each file (of course the fingerprint must ignore this line), so I did. This gets done using a script, and I didn't like always saying "yes" to Emacs complaining about editing a file changed on the disk, so I reset the mtime. I really don't think it was the brightest idea ever. >>> read them all, so it recognizes the change? Ideally, using a configuration >>> variable. The repo is fairly small, so speed is no issue here. >> >> Try git update-index --refresh. I'm not aware of any config option, >> but you might want to look through man git-config. > > That won't work, as it respects the stat information. So does > --really-refresh. AFAIK, there isn't a way to tell update-index to > ignore start information, short of blowing away the index entirely, and > doing a read-tree to repopulate it. Blowing away the index could work for me. I had to check if it's clean (equal to the HEAD or working tree) first, so I loose no work. But this is a bit too much work for making my mtime hack work. > I'm curious what this use case is, and whether it would be acceptable to > update something like ctime on the files to make them stat-dirty to git. I'd suppose, Emacs does the same checks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html