Re: Applying .gitattributes text/eol changes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Marc Strapetz venit, vidit, dixit 13.01.2011 15:28:
>>> case of missing .git/index, Git freshly writes all working tree files,
>>> ignoring already existing files which already have the correct content.
>>> Maybe this behavior is by intention and makes sense in some cases. In my
>>> case it has adverse effects on IDEs and probably other tools which are
>>> monitoring the file system.
>>
>> ...but changing gitattributes is something you don't do routinely in
>> your workflow; so, at worst there would be an occasional unnecessary run
>> of your build process.
> 
> Our Git-SVN bridge does it, potentially on every pull. This is why we
> currently need to run "rm .git/index && git reset --hard" after every
> pull, resp. every checkout (switching to another commit may result in
> changed .gitattributes as well).

OK, now you're telling us what this is about ;)

> If a "git checkout" would (optionally) make sure that all EOLs are
> properly set according to .gitattributes, the problem would be resolved.
> As this might be not so easy to implement, my suggestion was to make
> "git reset --hard" work more unobtrusive. I think we can provide a
> corresponding patch, if it has chances to get accepted.

There have been other cases where git update-index --really-refresh
wasn't enough. You might want to check whether that is a suitable "patch
attack vector". This might be useful not only for you but also for others.

Michael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]