[RFC/PATCH 0/2] unpack-trees: handle lstat failures in verify_absent

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Here are two cases where we ignore the result from lstat in
unpack_trees.  I think we rather shouldn't ignore it.  Sane?

Jonathan Nieder (2):
  unpack-trees: handle lstat failure for existing directory
  unpack-trees: handle lstat failure for existing file

 unpack-trees.c |    8 ++++++--
 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]