Carl Worth wrote: >On Tue, 14 Nov 2006 16:31:50 -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> >> For another example, having a commit command to commit >> everything by default is disastrous for people who allow their >> workflows to often be interrupted. > > Workflow-interruption is an important thing to support, but separating > update-index and commit really doesn't address it nearly as much as I > would like. The lack of really good workflow-interruption support has > been one of my longest-running annoyances with git, (perhaps because I > have a problem with trying to do too many things at once). Git can > create and change branches fast enough that it really should be able > to help me better with this. The only missing piece is being able to > stash the dirty stuff on the current branch, to be able to come back > to it later. I've talked a bit about what I would like in this area > before, and I really just need to code it up. There is git-stash/git-unstash floating somewhere in the archive. -- Jakub Narebski Warsaw, Poland ShadeHawk on #git - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html