Kevin Ballard <kevin@xxxxxx> writes: > Is there any rationale for this behavior? Not a rationale, but an explanation is that most of the time we walk the history and sorting by date is the first thing that needs to be done, and the --no-walk option was an afterthought that was tucked in. I suspect that a three-liner patch to revision.c:prepare_revision_walk() would give you what you want. Instead of calling insert-by-date, you append to the tail when revs->no_walk is given, or something. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html