Junio C Hamano wrote: > Anders Kaseorg <andersk@xxxxxxx> writes: >> The executable bit on gitk-git/gitk was lost (accidentally it seems) by >> commit 62ba5143ec2ab9d4083669b1b1679355e7639cd5. Put it back, so that >> gitk can be run directly from a git.git checkout. >> >> Note that the script is already executable in gitk.git, just not in >> git.git. > > It did not lose the bit by accident but 62ba5143 pretty much was a > deliberate fix. "gitk" is a source file, and its build product, > gitk-wish, is what is eventually installed with executable bit on. How does this case differ from other executable source files like git-am.sh? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html