Linus Torvalds wrote: > But the fact is, git isn't really that hard to work out, and the commands > aren't that complicated. There's no reason to rename them. We do have > other problems: > > - default branch selection for merging is broken (it should definitely > take the current branch into account). When I do "git pull" with no > branch specification, and I happen to be on a branch that is associated > with something else than "master" in the remote, I shouldn't merge with > master. This problem is _slightly_ migitated by branch.<name>.merge config variable. Slightly because you have to specify branch to merge, instead of forbidding merge if you are not on specific branch (and you don't override it). > - I agree that having to create temporary branches to just look at a tag > that you don't want to actually develop on is just unnecessarily > bothersome. Agreed. -- Jakub Narebski Warsaw, Poland ShadeHawk on #git - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html