Re: [minor BUG] cherry-pick -x doesn't work if a conflict occurs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2011/1/5 Uwe Kleine-KÃnig <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>> The man page says -x only takes effect when you do not have a conflict, so there
>> is no bug.
> ah, I wonder if this is intended or just documenting a short-coming :-)

I think it's intended as it's no longer the original commit, but
personally I think it should be configurable (I'd like -x to be
configurable as well). For now, I use the following "recommit" script
after a cherry-pick conflict.

#!/bin/sh
# Used after a cherry-pick conflicts to commit with the original
# authorship (commit -c) but keep the newly generated commit message
#
self=$(cd "$(dirname "$0")" && pwd -P)/$(basename "$0")
. "$(git --exec-path)/git-sh-setup"
require_work_tree
cd_to_toplevel
test -f .git/MERGE_MSG || die "No .git/MERGE_MSG"

if test "$GIT_EDITOR" = "$self"
then
  cat .git/MERGE_MSG > .GIT/COMMIT_EDITMSG
  exit 0
fi

if sha1=$(sed -ne \
  's/^(cherry picked from commit \([a-f0-9]\{40\}\))$/\1/p' .git/MERGE_MSG)
then
  export GIT_EDITOR="$self"
  git commit -c $sha1
fi

j.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]