Re: [PATCH 2/2] gitweb: make logo optional

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jakub Narebski wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Dec 2011, Jonathan Nieder wrote:

>> Some sites may not want to have a logo at all.  In particular, git
>> instaweb can benefit from this.
>
> Why do you think that git-instaweb can benefit from not having logo?
> You need gitweb.css anyway, so it is not much more trouble to serve
> additional static file, git-logo.png.

Yep, that sentence is stale (it only applied in 1.7.1.x days) and
should have been removed.

> corelist (Module::CoreList) says that Perl 5.8.0 has CGI.pm version 2.81;
> IIRC gitweb requires something later than 5.8.0 for good support of
> Unicode (Encode module).
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> For what it is worth it:
>
> Acked-by: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@xxxxxxxxx>

Thanks for looking it over.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]