Erik Faye-Lund wrote: > Actually, I suspect that you know exactly what my concern is (based on > the above), and that it's not with your patch. Actually no, which is why I asked! :-D > I have a patch in my MSVC-tree that includes io.h in mingw.h, because > mingw.h already depends on facilities from io.h on MSVC. My point was > simply that this dependency was already present, and as such I think > mingw.h is the appropriate place to include it. OK, v2 of patch on the way... ATB, Ramsay Jones -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html