Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Nov 2006, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
>> Yes. The current "merge" started its life as Linus's porcelain
>> (we did not have fetch and pull infrastructure back then) but
>> quickly has become just a helper for pull to produce a merge
>> commit. If anybody thinks its UI is good as a general end-user
>> level command, there is a need for "head examination".
>
> If you mean "git merge" it sure needs to be brought forward. It can't
> be clearer than:
>
> git-merge the_other_branch
>
> or
>
> git-merge git://repo.com/time_machine.git
>
> to instantaneously understand what is going on.
You mean
git merge git://repo.com/time_machine.git#branch
don't you (perhaps with 'master' as default branch)?
--
Jakub Narebski
Warsaw, Poland
ShadeHawk on #git
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html